Sex, Lies and Photoshop: Why magazines should let readers know if images have been retouched. (New York Times, please let me embedd your movies.)
(thank you J Mora)
Sex, Lies and Photoshop: Why magazines should let readers know if images have been retouched. (New York Times, please let me embedd your movies.)
(thank you J Mora)
Interesting video. I’m sure I’m not the only “old” person over 30 who realizes that people have been retouching photographs from nearly the beginning of photography (it was harder to do on glass). You won’t change the photography world, but you can educate the population reading the magazines.
Mar 11th, 2009 / 10:08 pm
this video should see everyone, who who buys fashion magazines..
Mar 12th, 2009 / 1:56 am
one should insist that the magazines one buys will let you know of retouching, send them an email.
Mar 12th, 2009 / 6:46 am
one should insist that the magazines one buys will let you know of retouching, send them an email.
OH! You’re my new favorite blogger fyi
Mar 12th, 2009 / 6:59 am
and there’s one more downside, http://photoshopdisasters.blogspot.com/
cheers s*
Mar 13th, 2009 / 12:44 pm
I love this swissmiss… What’s wrong with letting people know its been retouched. I just assume every image I see has been ‘touched’.
I also take issue with the ‘hanger’ ideal of womens bodies on models. Linda, Christy, Naomi, and Cindy were all outrageously beautiful and unattainable but they were real with real womens bodies not 12 year old girls bodies.
Mar 16th, 2009 / 6:45 pm